To, The Assistant Passport
Officer (Policy) Regional Passport Office, Manish
Commercial Centre, 216 – A, Dr. A. B. Road,
Worli, Mumbai – 400 013.
22nd November 2013
Ref.: Your letter
No.F7(7)12-D-1545/12-308-Pool-1 dated 12th
November 2013 calling upon me to show cause. Reg.:
Passport No. Z 2084690 issued on 11th
February 2010
Sir,
1.
I am in receipt of your above letter on 13th
November 2013 and at the outset I have to state that I
do not have the Application submitted by me for renewal
of my passport and referred by you in the first para of
your letter under reply. In order to enable me to
submit a cogent, precise and appropriate reply I require
a copy of the Application form referred by you
at the earliest. I therefore request
inspection and photo copy of the Application form
referred by you in para 1 of your letter under reply.
2.
In addition to the above, I request you to kindly grant
inspection and copies of any complaint / complaints,
inter office memo, file notings, demi official letter
and/or any directive received from any person or the
basis upon which the aforesaid show cause notice has
been issued to me. The aforesaid documents
are of vital importance in order to enable me to reply
effectively and meaningfully. I therefore request
you to fix an immediate appointment for inspection and
tender the aforesaid documents at the earliest.
3.
Subject to above documents being offered for inspection
and photocopies being furnished I may point out that
there is a manifest error in your said letter.
Para -1 of your letter reads as under :
“This is with reference to
your passport application submitted on 08.10.2012, on
the basis of which your were issued passport bearing
No.Z-2084690 dated 11.02.2010”
4.
A bare reading of the above clearly discloses a patent
error in the date the Application has been submitted.
It is inconceivable that an Application for renewal was
submitted on “8-10-2012” and the passport
authority issued the passport on “11-02-2010”.
The aforesaid error is crucial and it is paramount
that the correct date of the submission of application
ought to be communicated to me.
5.
Without prejudice to the above and in the interim,
subject to inspection being offered and photo copy being
tendered. I am submitting this reply to
demonstrate that I have not committed any breach of
any provisions of the Passport Act, 1967 much less any
action can be instituted under Section 12(1) (b) of the
Passport Act as proposed.
6.
I am a Citizen of India. I am domiciled in the State of
Maharashtra for the past 55 years and I am residing at
the address given above since the year 2001.
7.
I am a passport holder and I was issued passport bearing
No.Q 113160 dated 8th February 1980.
The said passport was valid on and upto 7th
February 1985.
8.
To the best of my knowledge about 2-3 months prior to
the expiry of the aforesaid passport I had made an
Application for renewal. Copy of the
Application is not retained by me. In order
to ascertain the correct fact inspection and copy of
above Application form may kindly be furnished to me.
The said Application was duly processed and I was issued
Passport bearing No.C 823903 dated 12th August 1987.
This passport was valid on and upto 7th
February 1990.
9.
To the best of my knowledge about 2-3 months prior to
the expiry of the aforesaid passport I had made an
Application for renewal. Copy of the Application
is not retained by me. In order to
ascertain the correct fact inspection and copy of above
Application form may kindly be furnish to me.
The said Application was duly processed and I was issued
Passport bearing No. G 861817 dated 28th
February 1990. This passport was valid on
and upto 27th February 1995 and was further
renewed on 3rd January 1995 and was valid on
and upto 27th February 2000.
10.
To the best of my knowledge about 2-3 months prior to
the expiry of the aforesaid passport I had made an
Application for renewal. Copy of the
Application is not retained by me. In order
to ascertain the correct fact inspection and copy of
above Application form may kindly be furnished to me.
The said Application was duly processed and I was issued
Passport bearing No. B 1629967 dated 10th May
2000. This passport was valid on and upto 9th
May 2010.
11.
As the aforesaid passport was to expire, to the best of
my knowledge I made an Application on and around October
2009, but well before the date the passport was to
expire.
12.
On the date of Application no Criminal Case was pending
against me. As regards the only criminal
case instituted and which was pending prior to the
Application for renewal. The details of the
same are as under :
13. A
demonstrably false complaint was filed against me and
other. The said Complaint was registered as
FIR by MIDC Police Station, Andheri (East).
The said FIR vide Crime No.53 of 2006 was under
sections 387, 120-B, 506(ii) of IPC read with section 3
(i), 3, (ii), 3 (iv) of Maharashtra Control of Organised
Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Act). After completion
of investigation charge sheet was filed before Hon’ble
the Special Court ( under MCOC Act) for Greater
Bombay at Mumbai and registered as MCOC Special Case
No.11 of 2007.
14.
The trial was conducted before the Hon’ble Special Court
and by a reasoned Order and Judgment dated 5th
March, 2009 the Hon’ble Special Court was pleased to
honourably acquit me and other accused who stood trial.
The bail bond furnished by us stood cancelled and
sureties discharged. Copy of the Order and
Judgment dated 5th March, 2009 passed by the
Special Judge (under MCOC Act), Greater Mumbai is
annexed hereto and marked as ANNEXURE – A.
15.
Pursuant to the aforesaid order and judgment the
Criminal case instituted against me stood concluded with
my acquittal. No other criminal case of any nature was
pending against me as on date of passing of the said
order.
16.
On 31st July, 2009 the State of Maharashtra
belatedly filed an Appeal under Section 12 of the MCOC
Act in the High Court, Bombay. The aforesaid date
of lodging has come to my knowledge after subsequently
checking the case status on the web portal of the Bombay
High Court. However, kindly take note that the
Appeal was lodged without notice and/or copy of the
Appeal being furnished to me. Hence I was
unaware of an Appeal being preferred against order of
acquittal.
17.
As the Appeal was undisputedly barred by limitation, the
State filed Criminal Application No.850 of 2009 seeking
condonation of 70 days delay in fling the criminal
Appeal. The aforesaid Criminal Application No.850
of 2009 was moved, without notice to me on 7th
November, 2009. The Hon’ble High Court, however,
was dissatisfied with the contents of the Application
for Condonation of delay and directed filing of
additional Affidavits to set out reasons for the delay
failing which the Appeal would stand dismissed. A
copy of the order dated 7th November, 2009,
downloaded from the Website of the Bombay High Court, is
annexed hereto and marked as ANNEXURE – B.
18.
In compliance of the above Order it appears that the
State filed Affidavits of certain persons but requested
for further time to file Affidavit of the Public
Prosecutor of Court of Sessions, Greater Mumbai.
In light of the aforesaid application the said Criminal
Application was adjourned. On 19th
March, 2010 Criminal Application No.850 of 2009 was
taken up for hearing. As by then I had notice of
the said Criminal Application I appeared through my
Advocate. The Hon’ble Court was pleased to condone
the delay in filing the Criminal Appeal. Pursuant
to the said Order the Criminal Appeal stood registered
on the file of the High Court on 23rd March,
2010 as Criminal Appeal No.210 of 2010.
19.
The aforesaid Criminal Appeal was taken up for admission
on 30th March, 2010 on which date the said
Appeal came to be admitted.
20.
You shall, therefore, note that as on date of
Application, which to the best of my memory was around
October, 2009 or a month prior or subsequent thereto no
criminal case or Appeal was pending against me in
any Court of law.
21. I
have no doubt that the present Show Cause Notice is a
malafide and motivated action to harass me as I have
filed Writ Petition against senior police officers.
22.
Please take note that I have filed Criminal Writ
Petition No.3187 of 2009 against the former Commissioner
of Police, the former Joint Commissioner of Police
(Crime), former Asstt. Commissioner of Police (Crime),
Police Inspector attached to Crime Branch Unit No.8,
Asstt. Police Inspector attached to Crime Branch Unit
No.10, Sub-Inspector of Police attached to Crime Branch,
Mumbai HO Crime Branch, amongst others. The said
Criminal Writ Petition was lodged on 3rd
December, 2009 and registered on the very same date.
The Hon’ble Division Bench was pleased to issue notice
to all Respondents on 7th December 2009
directing that the notice is returnable on 18th
January, 2010 and tagged the Criminal Appeal filed by
the State with the said Criminal Writ Petition.
23.
On 4th October, 2010 the aforesaid Criminal
Writ Petition has been admitted with directions that it
be heard alongwith the pending Criminal Appeal.
24. I
am being harassed in as much as I was on several
occasions called upon by various Police
Stations/Officers from the rank of Sub Inspector up to
the rank of DCP/Crime Branch Units/Special
Squads/Detection Department from 16th July
2010 upto 3rd November 2011 on several for
recording my statements, making oral enquiries and
furnishing various documents. I was also called
upon by the MIDC Police Station for “Police Inquiry”
wherein I was asked questions regarding renewal of my
passport and details of the prosecution of the MCOC
case.
25. I
may also state that the entire gist of my statement was
recorded in Marathi a language with which I am totally
unfamiliar and I cannot read the said language. The
Officer informed me that the statement recorded is
complete and I have nothing to worry. I now have
reasons to believe that the Police enquiry referred
above and the present notice under the Passport Act is
nothing but a counter blast to the Criminal Writ
Petition filed by me against Senior Police Officers
including the Former Commissioner of Police, Shri A. N.
Roy and Former Jt. Commissioner of Police, Ms. Meeran
Borwankar.
26.
From the above and till documents as requested by me are
furnished, it is prima facie clear that I have not
furnished any false information or suppressed any
material information with a view to obtain a passport
under the Passport Act. As on date of Application
I have to the best of my knowledge (pending receipt of
the documents requested by me) furnished full and
complete information as requisitioned by the Application
Form. The details furnished by me are true
and correct and as per my knowledge at the time of
making the Application for renewal. I have,
therefore, not committed any offence or breach of the
Passport Act.
27.
Your notice to impound and/or revoke my passport
invoking Section 10(3)(e) of the Passport Act is
uncalled for and unwarranted.
28.
Take note that I was holding a valid passport when MCOC
Special Case No.11/2007 was instituted against me.
The passport authorities did not
consider impounding my passport throughout the period
the said criminal proceedings were pending. The
said criminal proceedings were terminated by Order and
judgment dated 5th March, 2009 ending in my
acquittal.
29. I
have attended the aforesaid criminal proceedings
punctually and regularly. I extended full
co-operation to the investigation as well as the Court
to ensure that the trial is expeditiously conducted.
There has been no complaint against me in any manner
whatsoever. It is significant to note that the
Hon’ble Special Court did not consider it necessary call
upon me to surrender the Passport and/or in any way
impose any impediment or restrain on my travel during
the pendency of the said criminal proceedings.
30.
As stated above the Criminal Appeal has been filed
belatedly and is nothing but a counter blast to the
various proceedings filed by me including before
the Maharashtra Human Rights Commission against Senior
Police Officers for foisting a demonstrably false case
against me. However, it is significant to note
that the Criminal Appeal has been admitted much after I
had applied for renewal of passport and the issuance of
the said passport. While the criminal Appeal was
admitted no request was made by the Government
Prosecutor for placing any restriction on my travel
abroad during the pendency of the Criminal Appeal.
31.
Please note that the Criminal Writ Petition No.3187 of
2009 filed by me against Mr. A. N. Roy, Former
Commissioner of Police, Ms. Meeran Borwankar, former
Joint Commissioner of Police Crime, Mr. Pramod Rane
former Asstt. Police Commissioner Crime, Mr. Vinayak
Sawarde, Police Inspector Crime Branch, Mr. Sagar
Shivalkar, Asstt. Police Inspector Crime Branch and Mr.
Ninad Sawant, Sub-Inspector of Police Crime Branch is
pending before the Hon’ble High Court and tagged
alongwith the said Criminal Appeal. In other words
Criminal proceedings are also pending against the
aforenamed respondents of which please take note.
32. I
have repeatedly called upon my Advocate to ensure that
the Criminal Writ Petition and Criminal Appeal are heard
as expeditiously as possible. As a citizen I
sincerely hope that justice will be rendered to me
during my lifetime. I also desire that the
pendency of the aforesaid two criminal proceedings in
the Hon’ble High Court should not be carried on
interminably. I am making utmost efforts to ensure
that the criminal Writ Petition is heard expeditiously
and I will make an application to the High Court for an
expeditious hearing in light of the notice received by
you. I would be requesting my Advocate to bring
the said notice to the attention of the Hon’ble Judges
of the Hon’ble High Court assigned to hear criminal Writ
Petitions and request that the same be heard and
disposed off out of turn.
33.
Apart from the above, please note that pending the
criminal proceedings is definitely not on account of any
act on my part. Further there is no apprehension
which has been expressed by any party or person that I
would not be available when the criminal proceedings are
taken up for final hearing. I assure you that
whenever the High Court lists the said criminal
proceedings for hearing I will be present in Court to
assist my Advocate. I have always made myself
available during investigation, during trial and when
the Appeal was taken up for admission. I will
ensure my availability when the Appeal is taken up for
final hearing.
34.
The notice issued to me prima facie is for extraneous
reasons and definitely on account of pressure brought
upon your goodself by the Police Officers of the Mumbai
Crime Branch. I’m sure that as an independent
statutory authority you shall not succumb to such
pressure brought upon you. Needless to state that
the said police officers being a party respondent to the
criminal Writ Petition ought not to have approached you
to take such an action. This is nothing but an
interference with the due administration of justice.
35. I
reserve my right to file a detailed reply to the Show
Cause Notice upon being offered inspection and
photocopies of documents requested for. In the
meanwhile please treat this as an interim reply.
In any event I must record that after you grant
inspection and documents I shall be entitled to an
opportunity of being heard in person. I,
therefore, reserve my right of personal hearing to
effectively and meaningfully demonstrate that the Show
Cause Notice issued by you requires to be withdrawn and
no case exists for impounding the passport and
jeopardizing my personal liberty.
36. I
therefore request that :
a)
The notice be withdrawn, under intimation to me, on
basis of this interim reply;
b)
In the alternative fix an appointment for inspection and
furnish documents to enable me to give a detailed and
complete reply to the notice;
c)
Grant me a personal hearing thereafter to satisfy you
that no case for impending Passport under the Act
exists.
Sincerely yours,
Mahendra Jagdish Agarwal
Encl: Annexures A&B as above
Search for content
Indian Squash Professionals
Address:
B/705, 7th Floor, Raylon Arcade, Next to Pidilite, Kondivita Lane, Andheri -East, Mumbai – 400 059
Tel : 9122-28314425/26/27
Mobile : +919819921785
Email: squashindia@yahoo.com